“Bipartisan Groups Urge House to Pass Smart Spending Amendments on #NDAA”

June 13, 2013
Dear Representative:
We, the leaders of our undersigned organizations may not agree on many things, but we all agree on this: The
time has come to reduce wasteful and ineffective spending at the Pentagon. Doing so will not only save
valuable tax dollars, it will help make America safer by making the hard decisions our national security
requires.
As you prepare to vote on H.R. 1960, the National Defense Authorization Act of FY14 (NDAA), we hope
you will consider ways to spend in accordance with the current law. The current bill authorizes $552 billion
for defense—$54 billion above current law spending caps. Whether or not one supports those caps, it is
irresponsible to continue to ignore current law and set our country on the path towards yet another
sequestration this fall.
There is a growing consensus—among members of Congress from both sides of the aisle, policy wonks of
various stripes, and even defense industry CEOs—that you can, and should, find areas for substantial savings
in the Pentagon’s bloated budget. Last week, two major consensus documents—one from a group of defense
experts at organizations from across the political spectrum, and the other from fiscal conservatives—
recommended major cuts and reforms in Pentagon spending that could save billions.
The White House has also weighed in via its Statement of Administration Policy (SAP) on the NDAA.
Specifically, the SAP objects to a number of programs about which Congress has ignored the advice of our
military leaders and provided funding that is neither requested nor desired.
We believe there are smart ways to achieve savings, and urge you to vote in favor of a handful of
amendments that have broad, bipartisan support. We urge you to use this opportunity to set a stronger, better,
and more sustainable path for our national security.
We urge you to vote YES on the following sensible amendments:
Aircraft Carriers
#2 Blumenauer (OR), Mulvaney (SC)
Reduces from 11 to 10 the statutory requirement for the number of operational carriers that the U.S. Navy
must have. This only affects the legislative carrier requirement; the Navy would make the determination.
Troops in Europe
#37 Coffman (CO), Griffith (VA), Polis (CO), Blumenauer (OR)
Directs the President of the United States to end the permanent basing of the 2nd Cavalry Regiment (2CR) in
Vilseck, Germany and return the Brigade Combat Team currently stationed in Europe to the United States,
without permanent replacement, leaving one Brigade Combat Team and one Combat Aviation Brigade–
nothing in this amendment should be construed as directing the removal of Landstuhl Regional Medical
Center, nor certain quick-reaction forces.
NASCAR Sponsorship
#25 McCollum (MN)
Prohibits any funds authorized in the bill from being used to sponsor Army National Guard professional
wrestling sports sponsorships or motor sports sponsorships. The amendment does not prohibit recruiters from
making direct, personal contact with secondary school students and other prospective recruits.Topline Cut
#32 Nolan (MN)
Reduces total funds authorized in this Act by $60 Billion. This will bring the spending level in the bill to be
approximately in line with the level mandated in existing law.
Eliminating $5b OCO Plus-up above Pentagon Request
#39 Van Hollen (MD), Moran, James (VA), Mulvaney (SC)
Matches the President’s budget request for Overseas Contingency Operations.
These are just a handful of the many recommendations our groups and other experts have offered for finding
savings in the Pentagon budget. Unfortunately, you and your colleagues will not be allowed to vote on
several other amendments that we supported because the House Rules Committee inexplicably rejected them.
Still, we hope you will support these five amendments which are each a step in the right direction.
The American people are counting on your courage to stand up to the status quo that has squandered far too
many taxpayer dollars in the name of national security. We urge you to vote for sensible savings to make our
country stronger and our future more secure.
Sincerely,
American Friends Service Committee
Coalition to Reduce Spending
Friends Committee on National Legislation
Fund for Constitutional Government
National Priorities Project
National Taxpayers Union
Peace Action
Peace Action West
Physicians for Social Responsibility
Progressive Democrats of America (PDA)
Project On Government Oversight (POGO)
R Street Institute
Taxpayers for Common Sense
Taxpayers Protection Alliance
USAction
Win Without War
Women’s Action for New Directions

 

Several of our allied organizations signed onto this letter and we urge lawmakers to also vote to cut spending! We will score all these amendments on our scorecard. 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s